| Страниц в теме: < [1 2] | WF Classic fails to see obvious similarities Автор темы: Krzysztof Kożurno
|
|---|
Dominique Pivard wrote:
Have you tried AC?
I have. It sometimes works fine, but at random occasions will insert the whole phrase without removing the first letter(s). This way I have to remove the extra letters at the beginning manually.
Small thing, but a lot of extra unnecessary work repeated couple dozen thousand times.
Not a major feature?
I can hardly agree there are major or minor features.
Unless you tell the user which features should be important, and which should not.
[Edited at 2012-08-20 05:25 GMT]
| | | | Clarisa Moraña 
Турция
Local time: 12:00
Член ProZ.com c 2002
английский => испанский
+ ...
I've just tested your example, using WF 3, latests built, and now results were obtained. Fuzzy threshold match 50%. The same result with WF Classic.
Using both memoQ and Trados workbench 2007, 75% fuzzy match, while Studio 2009, 73% fuzzy match.
I also tried deleting the figures in inches, but the result was the same: no matches at all.
Regards
Clarisa
| | | | | Info already reported | Aug 20, 2012 |
Clarisa Moraña wrote:
I've just tested your example, using WF 3, latests built, and now results were obtained. Fuzzy threshold match 50%. The same result with WF Classic.
Using both memoQ and Trados workbench 2007, 75% fuzzy match, while Studio 2009, 73% fuzzy match.
This information was already reported in the 2nd reply to the original post.
And the 6th reply mentioned Wordfast Classic's blindness with Krzysztof's particular segments has been fixed in version 6.04g.
This still leaves Wordfast Pro, but this thread is about Classic.
| | | | Clarisa Moraña
Турция
Local time: 12:00
Член ProZ.com c 2002
английский => испанский
+ ...
| I know... this is just to confirm that there aren't isolated cases. | Aug 20, 2012 |
Dominique Pivard wrote:
Clarisa Moraña wrote:
I've just tested your example, using WF 3, latests built, and now results were obtained. Fuzzy threshold match 50%. The same result with WF Classic.
Using both memoQ and Trados workbench 2007, 75% fuzzy match, while Studio 2009, 73% fuzzy match.
This information was already reported in the 2nd reply to the original post.
And the 6th reply mentioned Wordfast Classic's blindness with Krzysztof's particular segments has been fixed in version 6.04g.
This still leaves Wordfast Pro, but this thread is about Classic.
I believe Wordfast developpers will check what's going on if there is more than one isolated case. I also did some other tests, such as deleting the figures between brackets, and the results where the same. Why would I open a second post regarding similar issues?
Regards
Clarisa
| | | | | Страниц в теме: < [1 2] | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » WF Classic fails to see obvious similarities | Pastey | Your smart companion app
Pastey is an innovative desktop application that bridges the gap between human expertise and artificial intelligence. With intuitive keyboard shortcuts, Pastey transforms your source text into AI-powered draft translations.
Find out more » |
| | Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
Translation news related to Wordfast
