1,641 registrants

SDL Translation Technology Insights

Jun 20, 2016



Conference recap





Summary

Date: Jun 20, 2016
Registrants: 1,641
Attendees: 1,021
Sessions: 14




Sessions

Group discussion

SDL Trados customer experience chat

Time: 14:00 to 18:00
Presentation

Introduction to the TTI research and why we decided to take the technology pulse of the translation industry

Time: 14:10 to 15:05
Presentation

How and why technology is supporting the drive for quality

Time: 15:15 to 16:00
Presentation

Change working practices and technology

Time: 16:10 to 16:50
Presentation

Going beyond translation memory in the search for higher productivity

Time: 17:00 to 17:40
On-demand
presentation

An overview of SDL Trados Studio 2015

Time: 18:00 to 18:05
On-demand
presentation

Translating a single document in SDL Trados Studio 2015

Time: 18:05 to 18:10
On-demand
presentation

SDL Trados Studio 2015 – an introduction to the SDL Language Platform and SDL Trados Studio 2015

Time: 18:15 to 18:20
On-demand
presentation

SDL Trados Studio 2015 for beginners – how to get started!

Time: 18:20 to 18:00
On-demand
presentation

SDL Trados Studio 2015 – Your productivity, our technology

Time: 18:25 to 18:30
On-demand
presentation

SDL Trados Studio 2015 – Quality features in focus

Time: 18:30 to 18:35
On-demand
presentation

SDL Trados Studio 2015 – Personalizing Studio – Your Studio, your way

Time: 18:35 to 18:40
On-demand
presentation

SDL - A beginners guide to SDL Trados Studio 2015

Time: 18:40 to 18:45
On-demand
presentation

SDL - Top 5 time-saving apps from the SDL OpenExchange App Store

Time: 18:45 to 18:50




Conference feedback

I am very glad to attend SDL Trados conference.

Thanks


As a Trados/SDL user since 2005 and a faithful attendee of SDL Roadshows, I did not expect to find many new ideas during this conference. I was very pleasantly surprised, I put away any little things I was thinking of doing when glancing at my laptop, and gave the presenters my undivided attention. They did speak about the future of this industry and, reluctantly or enthusiastically, we have to live with it and adapt to the new reality. Thanks and congratulations.

EWALUM
Member since: Oct 27, 2015

Thanks!

alex suhoy
Member since: Oct 30, 2012

Translation technology insights is absolutely wonderful effort to keep translators up to date with all the changes coming into our life everyday.




Leave feedback →



Search chat logs

Search:

Chat session:




Chat session is based on session start and end time. There may be some overlap.



Time From To Content
11:50 Apr 8, 2014 Blandine-ATRIL: 1459982 All what you are listing here is available in DVX3
11:50 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All because the other two things you mention are in DVX3
11:51 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All recognized terms are not marked in any way in the source segment
11:51 Apr 8, 2014 hnoronha: 556405 All Here is my take on this: I have been in this industry for 29 years and was the guy who first requested Iko and Jochen to create a tool that can remember a sentence that was done at Trados in 1985.
11:52 Apr 8, 2014 hnoronha: 556405 All DVX is the most user-friendly of all the tools but badly needs to move away from Access
11:52 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All Pavel: the highlighting of source terms found by AutoSearch is something we're considering
11:52 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All but most of the private feedback we've had from individual users is that this is actually not particularly useful and is quite distracting
11:53 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All so we'll obviously be making it optional
11:53 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All Both Trados and MemoQ have it as standard, but if you make it available in any form in Deja vu it will be greatly appreciated.
11:53 Apr 8, 2014 hnoronha: 556405 All Trados database processing is 10 times faster; and the databases are smaller. The 2 GB limit on Access databases is unacceptable in a modern tool. MemoQ databases stink too - far too slow and unweildy
11:54 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All hnoronha – please, keep the conversation civil and respectful.
11:55 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All Pavel: what did Hildreth say?
11:56 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All Please, do not use words like 'stink', your point is clear even without making it too negative.
11:56 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All Hildreth: one of the main reasons why we didn't make the change in DVX3 was to allow for interoperability between DVX2 and DVX3
11:57 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All based on our experience when going from DV3 to DVX, and then from DVX to DVX2, it was clear that most people expected to versions to co-exist and interoperate
11:59 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All Back to the point: Deja vu x2's QA is unusable. Explained in detail here: http://www.proz.com/forum/d%C3%A9j%C3%A0_vu_support/230066-djv_x2_areas_to_improve_wishlist-page4.html
12:00 Apr 8, 2014 Nuri Razi: 941714 All Hi Everybody
12:00 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All If a term is entered in the termbase as stand alone and also as part of an expression, the QA will issue a warning if both target terms are not used at the same time in the same segment.
12:01 Apr 8, 2014 Pavel Tsvetkov: 634408 All Which makes no sense and is a huge waste of time in a big project.
12:01 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All Pavel: that sounds like a bug... it should only be marked as an error if it was in the Lexicon (which has a higher priority than the TB)
12:02 Apr 8, 2014 Drew MacFadyen: 601248 All http://www.proz.com/virtual-conferences/604/program/9448 Déjà Vu X3 training for beginners will begin shortly
12:02 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All I'll make sure we check this and get this fixed ASAP
12:02 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All Hildreth, SQL Server can handle huge DBs, but is not particularly fast if you want to use it from a desktop application
12:03 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All so it makes sense for a server-based product (where the network itself is a bigger I/O bottleneck)
12:03 Apr 8, 2014 Daniel Benito: 1130548 All but for a desktop application, something like sqlite is probably more appropriate