Interpreter’s ‘low pay’ halts a trial

Source: Express
Story flagged by: RominaZ

A FURIOUS Crown Court judge had to adjourn a murder hearing because a Mandarin interpreter refused to turn up, claiming he would “not be making enough money”.

The judge hit out when he was forced to halt the case against Chinese businessman Anxiang Du, from Coventry, who is accused of killing four members of a family in Northampton in 2011.

The clerk at Nottingham Crown Court said he had been told it was “not worthwhile” for an interpreter to turn up.

Mr Justice Julian Flaux said: “It would be completely unfair on Mr Du to go ahead without an interpreter. To say I am annoyed is an understatement. I will be asking for a written explanation. It is a complete disgrace.”

It is the latest row to hit the newly centralised interpreter service supplied by Capita Translation and Interpreting.

The deal has seen fees slashed, with interpreters no longer paid for time spent with defendants before they enter court, leading to an increasing number of hearings being abandoned.

Courts say they are now having to bypass the system “more than 50 per cent of the time” as interpreters either fail to turn up, or are not qualified to do the job if they do arrive.

Instead courts are having to raid emergency coffers and revert to the old system of directly sourcing translators.

The campaign group Professional Interpreters for Justice has revealed that Capita is providing only 48 per cent of the interpreters required by courts. More.

See: Express

Subscribe to the translation news daily digest here. See more translation news.

Comments about this article


Interpreter’s ‘low pay’ halts a trial
Luca Tutino
Luca Tutino  Identity Verified
Италия
Член ProZ.com c 2002
английский => итальянский
+ ...
No wonder May 18, 2013

I am not surprised. This happens also in the translation market. The low rate and unfair payment terms policies, currently adopted by most large multinational agencies, tend to damage everybody: clients cannot rely on services and quality, translators and interpreters are confronted with a depressed and unprofessional largely monopolized market, often leading to unsuitable working conditions, and agencies loose their names (again, in the case of some recently renamed service provider).

[E
... See more
I am not surprised. This happens also in the translation market. The low rate and unfair payment terms policies, currently adopted by most large multinational agencies, tend to damage everybody: clients cannot rely on services and quality, translators and interpreters are confronted with a depressed and unprofessional largely monopolized market, often leading to unsuitable working conditions, and agencies loose their names (again, in the case of some recently renamed service provider).

[Edited at 2013-05-18 13:27 GMT]
Collapse


 
Valeria Verona
Valeria Verona  Identity Verified
Чили
Local time: 00:32
Член ProZ.com c 2003
английский => испанский
+ ...
agree May 18, 2013

I agree with Luca 100%icon_frown.gif

 
Kuochoe Nikoi-Kotei
Kuochoe Nikoi-Kotei  Identity Verified
Гана
Local time: 03:32
японский => английский
It's better this way May 18, 2013

Killing 4 people is a very serious crime. This is a major trial and to serve the interests of justice they need the best interpreter the court can find. Instead they'll have to settle for the best interpreter who is desperate or inexperienced enough accept Capita's insulting terms... Not really the kind of person you want in your corner when you're on trial for your life.

 
Mohamed Mehenoun
Mohamed Mehenoun  Identity Verified
Канада
Local time: 04:32
английский => французский
+ ...
Hillarious May 18, 2013

That's hilarious! And sad ! It reminds me of the forms I received in the UK and which contained some major mistakes in French, same thing with a paper they hand you in the US consulate...Governments seem to be looking for the cheapest solutions nowadays... It's like a plague spreading everywhere...

And the translation business is hit hard, not so long ago, an agency proposed the great rate of 0.04 USD/word to me! The guy was explaining to me that I will have a very big work load...I k
... See more
That's hilarious! And sad ! It reminds me of the forms I received in the UK and which contained some major mistakes in French, same thing with a paper they hand you in the US consulate...Governments seem to be looking for the cheapest solutions nowadays... It's like a plague spreading everywhere...

And the translation business is hit hard, not so long ago, an agency proposed the great rate of 0.04 USD/word to me! The guy was explaining to me that I will have a very big work load...I kindly explained that, more work means that I'll be tired more and stressed more...So when I work more, I certainly make sure to make more money! And not the other way around!

It seems to me that the system is going more towards mediocrity, and an elitist (badly designed) vision where one man should do everything (i.e. the job of 10 people) and do it right...In actuality, the poor lad does it for peanuts, and the result is disastrous...

In the case of a court trial, I'm wondering who should the "victim or culprit" sue if he gets in jail because of poor interpretation!
Collapse


 
Kuochoe Nikoi-Kotei
Kuochoe Nikoi-Kotei  Identity Verified
Гана
Local time: 03:32
японский => английский
There's the rub May 18, 2013

Mohamed Mehenoun wrote:
In the case of a court trial, I'm wondering who should the "victim or culprit" sue if he gets in jail because of poor interpretation!

Sue? But how can he sue without an interpreter?


 
Peter Smedskjaer-Stenland
Peter Smedskjaer-Stenland
Фарерские острова
Local time: 03:32
датский => английский
+ ...
Malice? May 18, 2013

How can you tell if the guy is actually interpreting what you are saying?

Judge: How do you plea to first degree murder?
Defendant to Interpreter: Not guilty.
Interpreter to Judge: Oh he says he is guilty, very guilty.
Judge to Defendant: I find you guilty, and sentence you to death.
Interpreter to Defendant: He finds you not guilty and will throw you a going away party later.

Interpreter to Defendant's wife: So you all set for dinner tonight?


 
Edward Potter
Edward Potter  Identity Verified
Испания
Local time: 04:32
Член ProZ.com c 2003
испанский => английский
+ ...
Markets May 19, 2013

Court interpreting is an artificial, albeit needed, market. Any adjustment to market realities will be slow.

 
LilianNekipelov
LilianNekipelov  Identity Verified
США
Local time: 22:32
русский => английский
+ ...
Not in the US May 19, 2013

In the US court interpreting is not a market -- courts employ highly professional, certified approved interpreters directly. Court interpreting should never be a market. Agencies are hardly ever able to send their interpreters to court hearings, perhaps sometimes in the case of very rare languages. Legal hearings conducted by law firms are a different story.

The monopolization of translation and interpreting is a result of a total misunderstanding what these services are about. Inte
... See more
In the US court interpreting is not a market -- courts employ highly professional, certified approved interpreters directly. Court interpreting should never be a market. Agencies are hardly ever able to send their interpreters to court hearings, perhaps sometimes in the case of very rare languages. Legal hearings conducted by law firms are a different story.

The monopolization of translation and interpreting is a result of a total misunderstanding what these services are about. Interpreting and translation agencies should be more like the talent agencies (for artistic professions) or publishing agencies. They should never become anything even closely related to office support personnel agencies, which many seem to be like these days.



[Edited at 2013-05-19 08:21 GMT]
Collapse


 
Phil Hand
Phil Hand  Identity Verified
Китай
Local time: 11:32
китайский => английский
Not sure what you mean by this... May 19, 2013

Edward Potter wrote:

Court interpreting is an artificial, albeit needed, market. Any adjustment to market realities will be slow.


But it's worth noting that the UK has moved from multiple providers of court interpreting services to (theoretically) one provider. We've moved away from the "market", however that is defined.

(In practice, multiple providers are still used because that one provider has proved inadequate, and this is one area where we can't tolerate corporate failure.)


 
Attila Piróth
Attila Piróth  Identity Verified
Франция
Local time: 04:32
Член ProZ.com
английский => венгерский
+ ...
Tolerance of corporate failure May 19, 2013

Phil Hand wrote:
(In practice, multiple providers are still used because that one provider has proved inadequate, and this is one area where we can't tolerate corporate failure.)


Quite the contrary. The tolerance of corporate failure in this particular case goes beyond all limits.

Attila


 
Ty Kendall
Ty Kendall  Identity Verified
Великобритания
Local time: 03:32
иврит => английский
Stubborn May 19, 2013

Attila Piróth wrote:

Phil Hand wrote:
(In practice, multiple providers are still used because that one provider has proved inadequate, and this is one area where we can't tolerate corporate failure.)


Quite the contrary. The tolerance of corporate failure in this particular case goes beyond all limits.

Attila


Quite. They should have rescinded the framework agreement long ago. I can only assume they fear appearing foolish, although imo they look more foolish by trying to flog a dead horse.


 
Peter Smedskjaer-Stenland
Peter Smedskjaer-Stenland
Фарерские острова
Local time: 03:32
датский => английский
+ ...
Is it a public good monopol? May 19, 2013

In this case, the court put a contract to bid. Companies placed a bid for the work, promising consistent service quality. When the contract runs out, other companies can submit a bid and acquire the contract. Between bids, companies are evaluating the worth of that contract. Companies that think submitting a bid on that contract is worth their time and effort will invest in their own company's capacity. By the time the bidding process starts, you may have one company, in which case, it is a form... See more
In this case, the court put a contract to bid. Companies placed a bid for the work, promising consistent service quality. When the contract runs out, other companies can submit a bid and acquire the contract. Between bids, companies are evaluating the worth of that contract. Companies that think submitting a bid on that contract is worth their time and effort will invest in their own company's capacity. By the time the bidding process starts, you may have one company, in which case, it is a form of monopoly, or a few companies, which is an oligopoly, or many companies offering the exact same services, which is define by the contract, which defines the market as a market in perfect competition.

Because the service between all companies in the market will be identical, either the company is unable to live up to the contract, or if the company can defend its service of the contract, the problem is the contract itself. I am putting my money on the latter of the two; the contract is at fault.

This means, I predict, if there is more than one company or if there are many companies submitting bids next time, we will see the exact same result.
Collapse


 
Ty Kendall
Ty Kendall  Identity Verified
Великобритания
Local time: 03:32
иврит => английский
Partially perhaps May 19, 2013

ExScientiaVera wrote:
the contract is at fault.


Maybe, I haven't read the text of the FA but I would guess it is not without flaws. However, this catastrophe happened mainly because the MOJ awarded the contract to a small, relatively unknown company who simply wasn't equipped or able to fulfil its obligations. Despite the fact it has now been taken over by the Capita group the FA is so tainted by the fallout from ALS that it's hard to see how it is remotely salvageable as a contract, regardless of who takes it on next.


 
Attila Piróth
Attila Piróth  Identity Verified
Франция
Local time: 04:32
Член ProZ.com
английский => венгерский
+ ...
Ireland to follow suit? May 19, 2013

Ty Kendall wrote:

Maybe, I haven't read the text of the FA but I would guess it is not without flaws. However, this catastrophe happened mainly because the MOJ awarded the contract to a small, relatively unknown company who simply wasn't equipped or able to fulfil its obligations.


Over 80% of the interpreters on the national register bravely boycotted any cooperation with the winner of the FA because of the inadmissible working conditions. I expect the same people would have said categorically no to a much bigger corporation offering the same unacceptable work conditions.

Unfortunately, we will soon see whether this hypothesis is true. The UK example will be followed in Ireland (see this link and click on the April bulletin), where the court interpreting tender was won by three language companies, including a huge one that is the market leader in many countries.

And as someone in the UK could get away with it, they propose similarly scandalous working conditions:
Naturalisation and Immigration Services are now paid €15 per hour, plus €1.25 for every 5 minutes thereafter.
For example, the Courts Service will pay €33.79 for 100 kilometres but [Translation company] will pay the interpreter a lot less - €18.60. Tolls and parking fees are not covered. There is no longer any extra payment for work carried out on Saturdays.


Attila

[Edited at 2013-05-19 19:13 GMT]


 

Sign in to add a comment

To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator:

Модератор(ы) этого форума
Jared Tabor[Call to this topic]

You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request »
This discussion can also be accessed via the ProZ.com forum pages.


Translation news
Stay informed on what is happening in the industry, by sharing and discussing translation industry news stories.

All of ProZ.com
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Поиск термина
  • Заказы
  • Форумы
  • Multiple search